Friday, February 13, 2015
My recent works
A bit of this and a bit of that: http://www.dailyo.in/user/8/rahmaninama
On India Today: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/author/Md-Hussain-Rahmani/1.html
Why Shahi Imam's appeal in AAP's support is not a communal rant
Why Shahi Imam's appeal in AAP's support is not a communal rant
A day ahead of crucial voting for Delhi Assembly elections, Shahi Imam of Delhi's Jama Masjid Syed Ahmed Bukhar issued a statement appealing to vote for the Aam Aadmi Party saying Delhi needed a secular government and AAP is one. He further said as they are close to forming a government people must support them.
Minutes after the appeal, Union Finance Minister Arun Jailtely called a press conference saying those who are against this "fatwa' should vote in 100 per cent. The whole day BJP spokespersons kept on using the term fatwa a simpe statement. AAP was quick to reject the support of the Imam, issuing a statement that they not only reject the support but also condemn the kind of communal politics the Imam does.
Here are five reasons why the Shahi Imam's appeal to vote for AAP is not communal.
Firstly, it was not a fatwa or decree as the fatwa is a ruling governed by Sharia law and only a Mufti (jurist) is entitled to issue it. As the last ditch effort to bounce back in a almost lost battle, BJP chose to call it a fatwa to communalise and polarise the already charged political atmosphere of the national capital and reap the benefits of religious polarisation which it has been doing since its inception in 1980.
Secondly, the Shahi Imam is well within his right to appeal for vote to a certain party very much like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Baba Ramdev and other sheers who often campaign for the saffron party. Moreover, this is not the first time the Imam did so. He is as bad as our politicians of the day are and like them has always been switching sides. Last time he did issue the statement to vote for Congress. Sometime back, he stood by Mulayam Singh Yadav and his archrival Mayawati too. His predecessors had also supported Janata Party of which BJP's precursor Jan Sangh was an important part in 1976 after the imposition of Emergency. More than an Imam, Bukharis are political figures and their statements are essentially a Chunavi Jumla.
Thirdly, why only Imam's call for vote to a certain party becomes a communal rant wherein our mainstream parties have been actively exploiting other religious figures for political gains. Senior BJP leaders like Rajnath Singh, Uma Bharti and others do attend meetings of Hindu sheers and ask them for the support. In the recent example, even Dera Sachha Sauda chief Gurmit Ram Rahim has extended support to the BJP.
Fourthly, RSS and its various affiliates are the backbone of its political outfit the BJP and its pracharaks go on the grounds asking votes in the name of Hindutava. So why all and sundry hound the Imam for issuing mere a statement.
Fifthly, the almost eight months of BJP's rule at the Centre has seen the unprecedented rise of right-wing fringe elements and incidence of communal violence which really make minorities feel insecure. AAP till now has refrained from sectarian or communal politics so it could be a natural choice for the minorities.
The Shahi Imam's plain political statement was blown out of proportion only because in popular perception a Muslim cleric is a communalising figure and his statement is anything but a communal rant.
A day ahead of crucial voting for Delhi Assembly elections, Shahi Imam of Delhi's Jama Masjid Syed Ahmed Bukhar issued a statement appealing to vote for the Aam Aadmi Party saying Delhi needed a secular government and AAP is one. He further said as they are close to forming a government people must support them.
Minutes after the appeal, Union Finance Minister Arun Jailtely called a press conference saying those who are against this "fatwa' should vote in 100 per cent. The whole day BJP spokespersons kept on using the term fatwa a simpe statement. AAP was quick to reject the support of the Imam, issuing a statement that they not only reject the support but also condemn the kind of communal politics the Imam does.
Here are five reasons why the Shahi Imam's appeal to vote for AAP is not communal.
Firstly, it was not a fatwa or decree as the fatwa is a ruling governed by Sharia law and only a Mufti (jurist) is entitled to issue it. As the last ditch effort to bounce back in a almost lost battle, BJP chose to call it a fatwa to communalise and polarise the already charged political atmosphere of the national capital and reap the benefits of religious polarisation which it has been doing since its inception in 1980.
Secondly, the Shahi Imam is well within his right to appeal for vote to a certain party very much like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Baba Ramdev and other sheers who often campaign for the saffron party. Moreover, this is not the first time the Imam did so. He is as bad as our politicians of the day are and like them has always been switching sides. Last time he did issue the statement to vote for Congress. Sometime back, he stood by Mulayam Singh Yadav and his archrival Mayawati too. His predecessors had also supported Janata Party of which BJP's precursor Jan Sangh was an important part in 1976 after the imposition of Emergency. More than an Imam, Bukharis are political figures and their statements are essentially a Chunavi Jumla.
Thirdly, why only Imam's call for vote to a certain party becomes a communal rant wherein our mainstream parties have been actively exploiting other religious figures for political gains. Senior BJP leaders like Rajnath Singh, Uma Bharti and others do attend meetings of Hindu sheers and ask them for the support. In the recent example, even Dera Sachha Sauda chief Gurmit Ram Rahim has extended support to the BJP.
Fourthly, RSS and its various affiliates are the backbone of its political outfit the BJP and its pracharaks go on the grounds asking votes in the name of Hindutava. So why all and sundry hound the Imam for issuing mere a statement.
Fifthly, the almost eight months of BJP's rule at the Centre has seen the unprecedented rise of right-wing fringe elements and incidence of communal violence which really make minorities feel insecure. AAP till now has refrained from sectarian or communal politics so it could be a natural choice for the minorities.
The Shahi Imam's plain political statement was blown out of proportion only because in popular perception a Muslim cleric is a communalising figure and his statement is anything but a communal rant.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
काश तुम होती…….
सबकुछ बदल गया तुमहरे जाने के बाद
तुम होती तो ज़िंदगी और भी बेहतर होती………
मैं अक्सर इन्ही ख़यालों मे खोया रहता हूँ
तुम्हारी डाट पे जो आँसू निकलते थे
अगर वो आज भी जारी रहते
तो कुछ दाग़ दिलके धूल भी सकते थे
तुम होती तो एक आसरा होता
तुम होती तो क़दमो मे सारा जहाँ होता
तुम होती तो दिल खोल के हंस पाता
तुम होती तो जी भर के रो लेता
तुम होती तो चाँद मेरे पास होता
तुम होती तो सितारों मे आसियान होता
सूरज की तापिश कुछ कम होती
अगर मेरे पास तेरा आँचल होता
तुम होती तो मुश्किलें और भी आसान होती
तुम होती तो ज़िंदगी इतनी ना परेशान होती
काश तुम होती…….
तुम होती तो ज़िंदगी और भी बेहतर होती………
मैं अक्सर इन्ही ख़यालों मे खोया रहता हूँ
तुम्हारी डाट पे जो आँसू निकलते थे
अगर वो आज भी जारी रहते
तो कुछ दाग़ दिलके धूल भी सकते थे
तुम होती तो एक आसरा होता
तुम होती तो क़दमो मे सारा जहाँ होता
तुम होती तो दिल खोल के हंस पाता
तुम होती तो जी भर के रो लेता
तुम होती तो चाँद मेरे पास होता
तुम होती तो सितारों मे आसियान होता
सूरज की तापिश कुछ कम होती
अगर मेरे पास तेरा आँचल होता
तुम होती तो मुश्किलें और भी आसान होती
तुम होती तो ज़िंदगी इतनी ना परेशान होती
काश तुम होती…….
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Living without a role model!!!
In capricious arguments with a very good friend of mine, I took name of a leading contemporary historian as my role model because she was insisting upon to reveal a name that I consider as role model. Though, I angered her by sweeping remarks on the topic of discussion ‘which is the best academic institution in India?’ I was batting for my alma mater which she refuted saying it can be among ‘one of the best list’ not the best. Yes, even I realized I was arguing pointlessly and eventually had to surrender by buying her arguments that ‘one of the best’ or ‘one among leading’ is a safe position as far as categorization and comparison are concerned.
On the fillip side of it, I got an opportunity to introspect as do I really have a role model in that leading historian? If yes, then why? If not, then who is it whom I can call a role model and would like to emulate the person? Or the even wider question emerged was why I needed a role model? In fact, why should I seek one all the while knowing that we the humans are very much fallible? Only those who are sacrosanct or infallible qualify to be role models. And, no one is infallible in this world. If at all we want a role model, we must have the courage to flay theirs wrongdoings.
Yes that leading historian is one of the finest teachers I have ever seen. He is a living legend in academic circle. He is an extraordinary phenomenon. But the man is not infallible. He is not beyond criticism too. Recognition as a fearless exponent of Marxist historiography rained down on him. This very commitment to Marxism made him extremely dogmatic in his approach towards history writing. His allegiance to Marxism prevented him from criticizing CPM’s misrule. I know being think-tank of CPM he could have immense influence on Bengal politics. At least he should have tried to prevent the politics of incessant violence resulting in deaths of poor cadres. I am still waiting for any initiative from him asking CPM cadres to shun violence. After all, violence breeds violence.
Still an admirer of his academic caliber but now I am clear on one thing: He is not my role model. Rather I would not like to have one as it will restrict my ability to act as maverick.
Sorry my dear friend I take back the name. Henceforth you can consider me a man without a role model.
On the fillip side of it, I got an opportunity to introspect as do I really have a role model in that leading historian? If yes, then why? If not, then who is it whom I can call a role model and would like to emulate the person? Or the even wider question emerged was why I needed a role model? In fact, why should I seek one all the while knowing that we the humans are very much fallible? Only those who are sacrosanct or infallible qualify to be role models. And, no one is infallible in this world. If at all we want a role model, we must have the courage to flay theirs wrongdoings.
Yes that leading historian is one of the finest teachers I have ever seen. He is a living legend in academic circle. He is an extraordinary phenomenon. But the man is not infallible. He is not beyond criticism too. Recognition as a fearless exponent of Marxist historiography rained down on him. This very commitment to Marxism made him extremely dogmatic in his approach towards history writing. His allegiance to Marxism prevented him from criticizing CPM’s misrule. I know being think-tank of CPM he could have immense influence on Bengal politics. At least he should have tried to prevent the politics of incessant violence resulting in deaths of poor cadres. I am still waiting for any initiative from him asking CPM cadres to shun violence. After all, violence breeds violence.
Still an admirer of his academic caliber but now I am clear on one thing: He is not my role model. Rather I would not like to have one as it will restrict my ability to act as maverick.
Sorry my dear friend I take back the name. Henceforth you can consider me a man without a role model.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
तुम क्या जानो....
तुम क्या जानो हम ने खुद को कितना तडपया है
जिसके हँसने से हंसते थे,उसको ही गँवाया है...
खोने की गिनती मत पूछो
कुछ भी कभी नही पाया है
काल ने ऐसा घेरा मुझको दिलका रिश्ता भी टूटा
बेबस होना क्या होता है,अब समझ मे आया है
कभी हारा तो कभी जीत गया
मन का जो था वो भी मीत गया
गाया करता था जिसको पागलपन से
वो भी तो अब गीत गया....
दिन चढ़े तक सोते रहना,खामोशी से रोते रहना
इनको आदत के तौर पे पाया है
तुम क्या जानो...
जिसके हँसने से हंसते थे,उसको ही गँवाया है...
खोने की गिनती मत पूछो
कुछ भी कभी नही पाया है
काल ने ऐसा घेरा मुझको दिलका रिश्ता भी टूटा
बेबस होना क्या होता है,अब समझ मे आया है
कभी हारा तो कभी जीत गया
मन का जो था वो भी मीत गया
गाया करता था जिसको पागलपन से
वो भी तो अब गीत गया....
दिन चढ़े तक सोते रहना,खामोशी से रोते रहना
इनको आदत के तौर पे पाया है
तुम क्या जानो...
Monday, December 20, 2010
Of friendship, corruption and commitment!
A couple of days ago, a good friend of mine asked a very simple and direct question; Will you ever get lured by money gained through corrupt or immoral means? If given an opportunity will you make extra buck through corrupt ways? The question was at the backdrop of what is happening in politics, corporate involving bigwigs of media world. The question pushed me to the corner and I needed some time to answer. Anyway, how could I answer such question which will have a direct bearing on my image and it would be mere a lip service as right now I am not in a position to involve in corrupt practices or dispel it . For sure, I wanted to answer honestly with utmost commitment. That’s why I thought to avoid a cliché like, I would be the last person to think about unfair means or corruption or abuse of power--which I don’t have. In order to avoid a direct answer, I took refuse in my innocuous ability to argue things so that the scope and meaning of the subject be widened and gravity of the matter is dissolved.
Before spelling any word, I needed to ask myself--can I be involved into corrupt practices for want of money, power etc. And, a war erupted within. A war between my real-self and doubtful-self. Meanwhile, my friend was laughing at me for deflecting a very trivial question as for her it was simply a question of either ‘yes’ or no’. But for me it was a soul searching opportunity and a chance to give words and live by it.
Despite of a marathon within, I still could not make my mind up for a concrete and honest answer so tried to evade it by bringing in the theory of relativity with various allied meaning and scope of the word corruption, thinking of our Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s current situation. A man of rare integrity with cleanest image is in the dock for allowing corruption in his cabinet. You can not question personal integrity of Dr. Manmohan Singh, but of course, there is a big question mark on his tenure as the prime minister of a cabinet fraught with many examples of impropriety and financial fraud. So corruption is a very relative term and it can taint you even while you are not personally involved into it.
My friend fired a salvo by accusing me of delaying the answer and the delay says all. Further it was said, Rahmani you failed the test and so lost the right to question those whose corruption stories are making headlines these days. If you can’t guarantee your personal integrity and honesty, what is a point in taking high moral ground on corruption issues? Yes, her observation was right. I might have failed just because I never wanted to reply without commitment to the words and act dishonestly to a very good friend. Rather than answering, I suggested her: Go and do this test on others and find out how many people pass it with honest admission?
After all, honesty can’t be spoken. It can be displayed through practices.
Before spelling any word, I needed to ask myself--can I be involved into corrupt practices for want of money, power etc. And, a war erupted within. A war between my real-self and doubtful-self. Meanwhile, my friend was laughing at me for deflecting a very trivial question as for her it was simply a question of either ‘yes’ or no’. But for me it was a soul searching opportunity and a chance to give words and live by it.
Despite of a marathon within, I still could not make my mind up for a concrete and honest answer so tried to evade it by bringing in the theory of relativity with various allied meaning and scope of the word corruption, thinking of our Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s current situation. A man of rare integrity with cleanest image is in the dock for allowing corruption in his cabinet. You can not question personal integrity of Dr. Manmohan Singh, but of course, there is a big question mark on his tenure as the prime minister of a cabinet fraught with many examples of impropriety and financial fraud. So corruption is a very relative term and it can taint you even while you are not personally involved into it.
My friend fired a salvo by accusing me of delaying the answer and the delay says all. Further it was said, Rahmani you failed the test and so lost the right to question those whose corruption stories are making headlines these days. If you can’t guarantee your personal integrity and honesty, what is a point in taking high moral ground on corruption issues? Yes, her observation was right. I might have failed just because I never wanted to reply without commitment to the words and act dishonestly to a very good friend. Rather than answering, I suggested her: Go and do this test on others and find out how many people pass it with honest admission?
After all, honesty can’t be spoken. It can be displayed through practices.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Ashamed of being an Indian
I feel dejected and ashamed of being an Indian as much India is ashamed of its more than seventy per cent impoverished population.
How elite organizers of the CWG are looting tax payers’ money has been widely discussed and it has jolted the conscience of even the more affluent and urban people.
A very urbane friend of mine, who always lived in Metro cities had foreign trips and is well placed financially, feels embarrassed about how marginalized pupation being driven away from East Delhi so that CWG rosy coatings are not distorted . She has never been to any village. What she knows about village life is through her friends from rural backgrounds. I tried to get her convinced about how CWG has exposed India expecting well polished contradictory arguments from her owing to her pure urbane background. To my utter surprise, she did not contradict me, and, for the first time, was in full agreement with what I had to say. As a human being she was hurt on the sight of policemen driving away rikshawallas, thelawallas and hawkers.
My point is that at personal level, we all human beings are concerned about plight of average poor fellow and would never want to drive them away and rob them of their daily earnings just for the sake of any elitist and corrupt Games show. This is basic human nature. Contrary to this, when we collect our egos in notion of patriotism, which has no virtue, we tend to forget to dissect our various issues and identities. India is primarily identified with its rural masses where majority of populations live in countryside, survive on agriculture.
We forget that these hawkers, rickshaw wallas, population living in bed of Yamuna represent more than seventy per cent of Indian population and their pride don’t lie in successful CWG. Driving them away from Games’ surrounding amounts to depriving them from rights of being Indian.
Here I find the concept of nationalism and essence of being Indian faltering. Precisely, nation is an imagined community which is very taxing and demanding. That’s why unknown taxpayers and marginalized will have to bear the expense of an elitist show which will never bring any change to their life anyway. Rather they are going to suffer.
How elite organizers of the CWG are looting tax payers’ money has been widely discussed and it has jolted the conscience of even the more affluent and urban people.
A very urbane friend of mine, who always lived in Metro cities had foreign trips and is well placed financially, feels embarrassed about how marginalized pupation being driven away from East Delhi so that CWG rosy coatings are not distorted . She has never been to any village. What she knows about village life is through her friends from rural backgrounds. I tried to get her convinced about how CWG has exposed India expecting well polished contradictory arguments from her owing to her pure urbane background. To my utter surprise, she did not contradict me, and, for the first time, was in full agreement with what I had to say. As a human being she was hurt on the sight of policemen driving away rikshawallas, thelawallas and hawkers.
My point is that at personal level, we all human beings are concerned about plight of average poor fellow and would never want to drive them away and rob them of their daily earnings just for the sake of any elitist and corrupt Games show. This is basic human nature. Contrary to this, when we collect our egos in notion of patriotism, which has no virtue, we tend to forget to dissect our various issues and identities. India is primarily identified with its rural masses where majority of populations live in countryside, survive on agriculture.
We forget that these hawkers, rickshaw wallas, population living in bed of Yamuna represent more than seventy per cent of Indian population and their pride don’t lie in successful CWG. Driving them away from Games’ surrounding amounts to depriving them from rights of being Indian.
Here I find the concept of nationalism and essence of being Indian faltering. Precisely, nation is an imagined community which is very taxing and demanding. That’s why unknown taxpayers and marginalized will have to bear the expense of an elitist show which will never bring any change to their life anyway. Rather they are going to suffer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)